Home TCW's Purpose TCW News Archives Listen to TCW Podcasts Contact Editor/Report News

Gregory XVII "Siri" Duty of Papal Restoration The Holy Mass Rosary in Latin Catholic Links Vocations

~ In Today's Catholic World ~

Read True Catholic News Below

News for The Church in Eclipse

"Uncompromising Catholic Militancy"

"You must fight energetically, since you know very well what great wounds the undefiled Spouse of Christ Jesus
has suffered, and how vigorous is the destructive attack of Her enemies."
-His Holiness, Venerable Pope Pius IX

September is the month dedicated to the Seven Sorrows of Our Lady
September is the Month the Church Dedicates
to the Seven Sorrows of Our Lady


Ecclesiastical Approbation

In Today's Catholic World carries the approbation in writing of the (True) Petrine Hierarchy in exile i.e., connected with Pope Gregory XVII. It faithfully adheres to the rules for Catholic Journals mandated by Leo XIII in the Apostolic Constitution Officiorum ac Munerum, January 25, 1897 - so heavily re-stressed by Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis, September 8, 1907.

St. Ignatius of Antioch - "Let no one do anything of concern to the Church without the bishop. Let that be considered a valid Eucharist which is celebrated by the bishop or by one whom he ordains [i.e., a presbyter]. Wherever the bishop appears, let the people be there; just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church." (Letter to the Smyrneans 8:2 - 110 A.D.)

(September 29th Dedication of St. Michael Archangel Double I Class)

St. Michael the Archangel
"Arise then, O Invincible Prince"

Brother John of the Cleft Rock (14th Century): "Towards the end of the world, tyrants and hostile mobs will rob the Church and the clergy of all their possessions and will afflict and martyr them. Those who heap the most abuse upon them will be held in high esteem. At that time, the Pope with his cardinals will have to flee Rome in tragic circumstances to a place where they will be unknown. The Pope will die a cruel death in his exile. The sufferings of the Church will be much greater than at any previous time in her history. But God will raise a holy Pope, and the Angels will rejoice. Enlightened by God, this man will rebuild almost the whole world through his holiness. He will lead everyone to the true Faith. Everywhere, the fear of God, virtue, and good morals will prevail. He will lead all erring sheep back to the fold, and there shall be one faith, one law, one rule of life, and one baptism on earth. All men will love each other and do good, and all quarrels and wars will cease."

In Today's Catholic World (TCW)
September 29, 2006 A.D.

(Minneapolis) -Sept 29- In addition to the thorough refutation presented by In Today's Catholic World (posted Sept 19 -see below) against the intellectually dishonest- lethal laicist's (John Vennari) recent purposeful attack on His Holiness Pope Gregory XVII and His Successors-
as promised: TCW has launched a Radio Broadcast (Podcast) which provides an overview of the Editor of (the Nicholas Gruner owned) Catholic Family News, Vennari's, recent atrocious actions, which clearly exposes the duplicity and damnable dishonesty of this key "useful idiot" FOR Anti-pope Ben 16's Counterfeit church of Darkness in keeping sincere, but confused Catholics in its evil, eternal, embrace.

Catholic Radio Podcast Online
TCW Radio
Click to listen to TCW's broadcast (09/27/06) defending the Pope Gregory XVII Reality (and His Successors) against the True Church's Enemies: Vennari & Co. (15:12 min.)

Note: many historical photos with accompanying captions were recently added to the Siri Thesis (FACT) page: Click here to view.

"Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist... The Church will be in eclipse..."
(Words spoken by Our Lady of La Salette to Melanie Calvat in 1846 A.D., a fully approved Church Apparition)

Pray For True Papal Restoration!

© In Today's Catholic World (TCW) 2005-2013 All rights reserved.

(September 19th Ss. Januarius, Bishop, and Companions Martyrs Double)

His Holiness Pope Gregory XVII
"Cardinal Siri" (A.K.A Pope Gregory XVII)
"Cardinal Siri", shown in the final months of his life, was allowed relative autonomy in his diocese as long as he kept silent about the various conclaves. The Remnant Newspaper reported that churches in Genoa looked the same in 1989 as they had in 1940. (Priests offered Mass facing the altars with no conciliar tables in sight.) "Siri" was Genoa's active archbishop until he was 81, long after the mandatory "retirement" age of 75 normally imposed upon diocesan bishops by the new "Church". But after granting an interview to Louis H. Remy regarding his 1963 election, "Siri" was forced into retirement. One year and nine months later, he was dead.

The Prophecy of Premol (5th Century): "...And I see the King of Rome with his Cross and his tiara, shaking the dust off his shoes, and hastening in his flight to other shores. Thy Church, O Lord, is torn apart by her own children. One camp is faithful to the fleeing Pontiff, the other is subject to the new government of Rome which has broken the Tiara. But Almighty God will, in His mercy, put an end to this confusion and a new age will begin. Then, said the Spirit, this is the beginning of the End of Time."

Cardinal Manning citing the universal testimony of the Fathers of the early Church about The Apostasy "The apostasy of the city of Rome from the vicar of Christ and its destruction by Antichrist may be thoughts so new to many Catholics, that I think it well to recite the text of theologians of greatest repute. First Malvenda, who writes expressly on the subject, states as the opinion of Ribera, Gaspar Melus, Biegas, Suarrez, Bellarmine and Bosius that Rome shall apostatise from the faith, drive away the Vicar of Christ and return to its ancient paganism. ...Then the Church shall be scattered, driven into the wilderness, and shall be for a time, as it was in the beginning, invisible hidden in catacombs, in dens, in mountains, in lurking places; for a time it shall be swept, as it were from the face of the earth. Such is the universal testimony of the Fathers of the early Church." -Henry Edward Cardinal Manning, The Present Crisis of the Holy See, 1861, London: Burns and Lambert, pp. 88-90

In Today's Catholic World (TCW)
September 19, 2006 A.D.

(Minneapolis) -Sept 19- In the September 2006 Edition of the Nicholas Gruner owned newspaper, "Catholic" Family News (CFN), the paper's Editor, John Vennari, attacked the Papacy of His Holiness Gregory XVII with his article entitled: The Cardinal Siri Thesis Why CFN Rejects It. In Today's Catholic World (TCW) immediately took note and action. Provided (below) for the True Church Militant (The Church in Eclipse) is TCW's response to the lethal laicist (Vennari's), affront. The faithful have the obligation to educate themselves as best they can about what is being presented. There is not a more important matter today than the Pope Gregory XVII Reality and His Successors, as Holy Mother Church Infallibly teaches:

"We declare, say, define and proclaim to every human creature that they by necessity for salvation are entirely subject to the Roman Pontiff."
-Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302, ex cathedra

Contra: 'The Cardinal Siri Thesis' by CFN, John Vennari, Ed.

Pro: 'The Cardinal Siri Thesis' by TCW, David Hobson, Ed.

John Vennari’s position contra ‘The Siri Thesis’ posted on the Catholic Family News (CFN) website for September argues that ‘The Siri Thesis’ set forth in The Pope in Red (www.thepopeinred.com) is untenable because it is unthinkable.

It is, however, indeed thinkable to the editor of CFN, John Vennari and The Remnant that we are living in the last times of the world as evidenced by their own frequent citation of the famous Cardinal Ottaviani quote on the Third Secret of Fatima: It (the Secret) tells "that the Great Apostasy will begin at the top". This reference is specifically to the Apostle Paul’s prophecy over the last times of the world (2 Thess 2:3) in which he speaks of the The Great Apostasy. There is no other. So despite promotion of ideas like ‘the great façade’ to describe the post conciliar modernist church, CFN is actually capable of at least entertaining the idea that what we are witnessing, is, in fact – The Great Apostasy.

John Vennari, the author of The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita (TAN), regards the Siri Thesis as unthinkable because he is of the opinion that in the conflict between Freemasonry and the Catholic Church, the goal of the Lodge is one of subversion. He states this position at the Fatima Peace Conference (Rome: 2001)."The Instruction called for the dissemination of liberal ideas and axioms throughout society and within the institutions of the Catholic Church so that laity, seminarians, clerics and prelates would, over the years, gradually be imbued with progressive principles.

"In time this mind set would be so pervasive that priests would be ordained, bishops would be consecrated and cardinals would be nominated whose thinking was in step with the modern thought rooted in the ‘Principles of 1789’ (pluralism, equality of religions, separation of Church and State, etc).

Eventually, a Pope would be elected from these ranks who would lead the Church on the path of ‘enlightenment and renewal. "It must be stressed that it was not their aim to place a Freemason on the Chair of Peter. [Emphasis Vennari’s] Their goal was to effect an environment that would eventually produce a Pope and a hierarchy won over to the ideas of liberal Catholicism, all the while believing themselves to be faithful Catholics."

This is a very limited understanding of Masonry and on the whole sounds rather benign, doesn’t it? ...As objectionable as liberalism is, it is merely one aspect of Modernism. Therefore, if the crisis of the Church to which we all are witness is merely a gradual infection with liberal ideas, then the Holy Father and the hierarchy and liberal Catholics can be won back to Tradition by a concerted effort of Catholics loyal to Tradition through: ‘we-resist-you-to-the-face’ approaches, a ‘traditionalist movement within the Church,’ prayer, and penance.

The Siri Thesis does not rest upon this limited view of Freemasonry. This view is simply a blind and mask. "The fight taking place against Catholicism and Freemasonry is a fight to the very death, ceaseless and merciless" states the Bulletin of the Grand Orient of France (1892: 183) quoted in www.thepopeinred.com/thesis.htm. "The secret movers of the French Revolution had sworn to overturn the Throne and Altar upon the Tomb of Jacques deMolay. When Louis XVI was executed, half the work was done; and thenceforward the Army of the temple [the Templars] was to direct all its efforts against the Pope." -Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma (1871: 824). (Quoted in www.thepopeinred.com/thesis.htm).

This latter is the Templar position within Freemasonry. This view takes precedence because the Templar position of the Jacobites, the Jacobins, B’nai B’rith, Prieure of Sion, and the Scottish is both the Foundation and the pyramidion of all Masonry.

The Siri Thesis is predicated upon the Templar understanding of Masonry and its final objectives. This was the outcome foreseen in Pope Leo XIII’s prophetic vision which he immemorialised in his prayer to the Archangel Michael: "Where the See of Blessed Peter and the Chair of Truth have been set up for the light of the gentiles, there they have placed the throne of the abomination of their wickedness, so that, the Pastor having been struck, they may also be able to scatter the flock. Arise, therefore, O Invincible Prince." It is also the view of Pope St. Pius X quoted at the end of this thesis.

Because of his limited understanding of Masonry: its morals (used here in the full spiritual sense of absolute laws contrary to Divine laws), dogma and objectives, it is unthinkable to John Vennari that, in the time of The Great Apostasy, the true pontiff would be exiled from Rome and that Rome would lose the Faith and become the Seat of the Anti Christ.

But Sacred Scripture attests to this event at the time of The Great Apostasy. The Early Fathers of the Church attest to it, Doctors and Theologians of the Church attest to it, and The Queen of Prophets attests to this in her confidence to Melanie Calvat at La Salette. Yet at CFN this is unthinkable.

The Pro-Siri Thesis will address this inability to think with the Catholic Sense of Sacred Tradition, point-for-point in reply to John Vennari’s editorial. Indeed, this is the only context in which the Hidden Papacy of these -our sad times- may be established and understood.

To John Vennari’s completely inexplicable argument of ‘untenability’, the Pro-Siri Thesis proposes that we are in fact living in The Time of the Great Apostasy. And what we are witnessing are the events of the mystical passion of Christ’s Holy Church. The facts of the hidden papacy of Pope Gregory XVII must be understood in this context.

Do the souls at Catholic Family News want to stand with Holy Church in these times or not? Do they want their readers, good Catholics seeking to persevere in the faith, to stand with Holy Church in these times or not? That is the burden of this debate.

We concede that important facts of matter regarding the hidden papacy of Gregory XVII are still coming to light.

We concede that Pope Gregory XVII made human errors. (Perhaps the editor of CFN will forgive him).

His Holiness writes: "I have done wrong because I should have avoided taking certain actions. I wish to say –but I am afraid to say it – making certain mistakes." (The Unelected Pope, by Benny Lai, p. 296.)

We do not concede that he was not the de jure pope of the Catholic Church. And we do not presume to judge Pope Gregory XVII by the standards under which Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop Castro Mayer of the Diocese of Campos were judged by John Vennari and found praiseworthy in their resistance to the novus ordo magisterium. Why would this be? The decrees of Vatican II were, afterall, the magisterial decrees promulgated by individuals whom they regarded as de jure popes of the Catholic Church and to whom they owed obedience.

If we are seeking to understand the mind and actions of Pope Gregory XVII, it must be in the context of the papal office, as Vicar of Christ. This is the office to which he acceded when the Chair of Peter was overturned and the hierarchy of the Catholic Church seized, in an Anti Christ revolution "in tiara and cope", a revolution fomented by the agents of Judeo Masonry within the 1958 Conclave.

Thus began the instrumentalisation of the Church as per The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita by John Vennari for Masonic goals and agenda.

Are there any precedents for understanding the mind and actions of a pope in such a time, at such an hour?

Yes. There is one sole precedent. The Passion of Our Lord.

In context of this precedent, then, we will meet John Vennari’s objections to The Pope in Red, (The Siri Thesis) point-for-point.

Paragraph 1. In this essay, John Vennari characterises "The Cardinal Siri Thesis"as untenable.

1.A: Tenable is a term from the Old French. It is a military term meaning defensible in battle. Now it is a term from both scholarly debate and military strategy. Tenable means a position that can be defended by either argument or battle. To say that a position in debate is untenable is to say that it cannot be defended by logical argument, by proofs or by witness. To argue a counter thesis that The Siri Thesis is untenable means that this counter thesis must (1.) state the The Siri Thesis fairly: its argument and its proofs so that all parties know the terms of debate ( 2. ) It must give counter-arguments based upon counter-proofs or by witness. In this debate, John Vennari is writing as an editor, defending editorial policy for what is widely regarded as a traditional Catholic publication at a time of unprecedented crisis in the Catholic Church over the issues of Sacred Tradition. He intends to establish the untenable nature of The Siri Thesis; therefore, CFN does not subscribe to it --so far so good.

Paragraphs 2 and 3: John Vennari fails to actually state The Siri Thesis in précis: its argument and proofs.

Paragraph 2. "The Siri Thesis purports that, at the 1958 conclave, Cardinal Siri was elected Pope and took the name Pope Gregory XVII; but was displaced by Cardinal Roncalli, who became the false Pope John XXIII. The same happened in 1963 with “Siri” being “elected”, and then displaced by the false Pope Paul VI."

2.A: "Purports". . There is a basis in fact, attested by many sources, that Cardinal Siri was elected Pope and took the name Pope Gregory XVII. These sources are multiple and congruent and the witness is believable. There is no ‘purports’ about it... Vennari directly misrepresents the thesis of his opponents in debate. Why does he even enter into debate with true Catholics if he does not have the integrity to state his opponent’s position fairly and according to rules of argument that are observed in even secular debate?

The many contributors to The Pope In Red (Louis H. Remy, Fr. Khoat, etc.) have rendered a great service to Holy Church by marshalling these sources and establishing this actuality from many sources and according to many proofs. Vennari does not trouble himself to dispute these truths with counter argument and proof. He settles for ‘purports’. Is this deceitful, or merely incompetent?

John Vennari is going to argue a counter thesis to these proofs, let’s hear him argue it then.

2.B: "Displaced" Another subterfuge. In what sense displaced? Cardinal Siri was elected. He accepted and chose the name Pope Gregory XVII. The name Pope Gregory XVII is known from many sources, including de-classified FBI documents. This alone proves he accepted office. He abdicated. The Conclave went to ballot again. The question is: "can he abdicate canonically?" There is no ‘displaced’ in The Siri Thesis. There is a narrative of historical events based upon eyewitness and inference.

Paragraph 4. "The fact that a Cardinal receives the necessary votes in a conclave, does not in itself make him Pope."

4.A: This is not what The Siri Thesis argues. Again, this is frank misrepresentation of the opponent’s argument. The Siri Thesis argues that having once accepted the papal office and chosen the name Pope Gregory XVII, the pontiff could not canonically abdicate under duress. Therefore he remained the de jure pontiff whether the 1958 Conclave went to another ballot or not. The burden of proof for the Siri Thesis is duress not necessary votes. The author of The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita chooses not to address the actual burden of The Siri Thesis, although his own research clearly establishes both motive and agenda for the infiltration of the Church by Judeo Masonry. Why? Does he not think that the Sons of the Widow who have fomented a century of bloody revolutions in nation after nation are capable of bringing duress to bear within a Conclave they have themselves infiltrated and in numbers significant enough to force a papal abdication? The Alta Vendita is one of the proofs of The Siri Thesis assisting to establish both context and motive in the historical narrative.

Paragraph 5. "Cardinal Tisserant reportedly admitted that irregularities did indeed occur at the 1958 Conclave."

5.A: Well, that would have to be the understatement of all time. Is the editor of Catholic Family News going to argue his thesis or not? Cardinal Tisserant’s admission does not substantiate anything for either the pro or contra position. Indeed this seemingly mild dismissal of legitimate concerns could be interpreted as a Satanic betrayal on the order of a Judas kiss. This is the same Tisserant who in 1962, acting on orders from antipope John XXIII, signed an agreement with Metropolite Nycodim (a spokesman for the Kremlin!!) that allowed the invitation of Orthodox / KGB observers to the Vatican Council II. This invitation was accepted on the condition that the Council refrained from condemning Communism. And John Vennari thinks the damage control from this Son of the Widow admitting a few ‘irregularities’ at the 1958 Conclave somehow counters The Siri Thesis. Give me a break.

A Catholic nation, the Ukraine, has been annihilated. Catholics from central Europe behind the Iron Curtain are being routinely carted off to the gulags and martyred for de fide. And Cardinal Tisserant as the agent of an antipope signs away Pope Pius IX’s condemnation of Communism: "a fatal doctrine most opposed to the very natural law" and Pope Pius XI's Divini Redemptoris: "no one who would save Christian civilisation may collaborate with it in any undertaking whatsoever." "What does it profit a man if he gain the whole world, but he lose his own soul?" -- the whole world! Done for the collaboration of a handful of Orthodox / KGB agents and an atrocious regime from the absolute pit of hell? For, this Cardinal Tisserant betrayed the Magisterium of the Catholic Church and uncounted martyrs. There are no words in the tongues of angels or of men for this treachery. For sins like this, the Archangel prostrated himself on the earth at the Cebaco and begged "for the infinite merit of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary – the conversion of poor sinners."

Paragraph 7. "While this indicates that ‘serious things have taken place’ at recent conclaves, it also reveals that Cardinal Siri was certainly not the Vicar of Christ."

7.A: What the Tisserant damage control indicates is that he, Tisserant, is a smooth liar. Given Tisserant’s track record, it more convincingly indicates that if a vile person of the ilk of Cardinal Tisserant is in damage control, then there is a lot of damage to control. This supports The Siri Thesis, not Vennari’s counter-thesis. And what is his counter-thesis, by the way?

Paragraph 7. "As one astute priest observed, only the Sovereign Pontiff is not bound by conclave secrets, so the fact that Siri said, ‘I am bound by the Secret’ demonstrates he was not Pope."

7.B: Sadly, there are minds out there in T.V. land that are sufficiently dumbed down as to think this ‘astute’ priest has made a good point. This submission of Pope Gregory XVII to ‘the Secret of the Conclave’ in and of itself proves nothing. It does, however, raise the question: to what end?

Let’s assume for the sake of argument that The Siri Thesis is correct. Let’s assume that we are living through the times of The Great Apostasy. The reference is to Cardinal Ottaviani who is frequently cited in the pages of CFN, The Remnant, and The Fatima Crusader for his famous quote about the Third Secret of Fatima: "It says among other things that the Great Apostasy will begin at the top." (2 Thess 2:3, in which the Apostle makes a prophesy over the last times of the world).

Thus, if we are in the last times of the world, then it is possible to think that we may be witness to the mystical passion of Holy Church.

In Our Lord’s passion, he submits to the de facto religious authority and the Roman authority. Previously, he had confronted them, but at the time of his passion, he submits. Under the hour of the power of darkness (Luke 22:53), he tells Pilate: "You could have no power against me at all unless it were given you from above" (John 19: 10). In the time of the eclipse of the Church, to use Our Lady of Salette’s memorable phrase, is it unthinkable that a true Pontiff would make a sacrifice of submission to de facto authority, to the Conclaves (paragraph 7), to the anti papacy (paragraph 12), to participation in false conclaves (paragraph 9), to participation in the Vatican II Council (paragraph 10) and the abuse which followed from it (paragraph 11)? Not unthinkable, but certainly mysterious, as mysterious as Our Lord in His Divine Soul.

Paragraph 10. "Cardinal Siri participated in the Second Vatican Council, which was called, if The Siri Thesis is correct, by a Holy Father who was neither Holy nor the Church’s Father. Siri accepted the decisions of Vatican II if interpreted in the light of Tradition. He adopted the reforms, celebrated the Novus Ordo Mass, ordained priests in the New Rite and consecrated bishops in the New Rite. Why would Pope Gregory XVII adopt sacraments and liturgical re-forms enacted by men whom he knew were false Popes? What sort of man does "our last true Pope" turn out to be?

10.A: This would seem to be the crux of Vennari’s argument of ‘untenability’. It is unthinkable to him that Pope Gregory XVII if he were a true pope would have participated in the Second Vatican Council called by a man he knew to be an Anti Pope. There is documented *witness of Pope Gregory XVII as a virtual hostage to the Masonic Order/s in control of the Vatican. The persecuted Pope's now, well known statement to *Fr. Khoat (who heroically got behind the enemy lines) on June 14th, 1988: "They can kill me at any time" would seem to make no impression upon Vennari. Incredibly, it is unthinkable to the author of the The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendia, that a hostage would 'carry on' as directed - even if he had a goal for His papacy.

Regarding Roncalli’s announcement of his Council to the world (Jan. 25, 1959), Pope Gregory XVII told 30 Days Magazine (Jan 17, 1985): "But what happened at that moment I don’t know because I had a cold – I have had two or three in my life - and I did not go to Rome for a month. So I don’t know what happened on January 25, 1959."

Now, this is a most unusual statement. How many people remember the days in which they had colds (by date!) – twenty-six years later? The hostage pope is telling anyone who cares to know that he was extremely reluctant to attend Roncalli’s Anti-Council. Although he can remember the precise date of his cold, he can’t remember what happened on the date Roncalli announced his Anti Council. In other (non-verbal) words: he blocked this out like a traumatic event. Maybe he did so because the spectacle of an antipope calling an ecumenical council was unthinkable, unbelievable and more than he could bear. What is documented is that Pope Gregory XVII asked his interviewer -Stefano M. Paci- to switch off his tape recorder from time to time because of the delicate and sensitive nature of the subject matter; another clue that he was being closely monitored by his captors who had many agents, many ways of knowing and hearing. "They can kill me at any time."

Only the God Whom he consoled by his sacrifices knows what hidden sufferings were endured by the Holy Father in his captivity.

But the Paci interview for 30 Days Magazine gets more interesting: "The idea of a Council", Pope Gregory tells us "was already circulating. Pius XII, I believe, had even set up a small commission which quietly studied the proposal."

Paci asked: Why was it put aside?

Pope Gregory reported that Pope Pius XII had said: "To prepare for a Council would take at least 20 years. So I can not do it; my successor will do it."

So as the designated successor of Pope Pius XII, and his true successor, according to the choice of the Conclave (1958) Pope Gregory could have called a Council, had his Cardinals not betrayed him and kept the secret of the 1958 Conclave. And right before Roncalli’s Anti- Council, Pope Gregory told the Italian magazine Orizzonti what the Council of Pope Pius XII’s successor would have to address, namely "…very important doctrinal matters. [As opposed to the concern of Vatican Council II with ‘pastoral’ issues]. The first task entrusted by Our Lord to His church being the teaching of truth. [As in the See of Peter set up for the light to the world, Pope Leo XIII] The Church is confronted with pernicious doctrines and serious errors. As to the powers of the laity, they must continue substantially to be those traditionally accepted and defined by Our Saviour when he established the sacred hierarchy."

So right away, we see Pope Gregory’s hostility to Modernism (the sum of all heresies) as corroborated in the Campos Profession of Faith: "Religious liberty, understood in the sense of an equalisation of rights between truth and error, giving supremacy to a supposed subjective right of man, to the prejudice of the absolute right of Truth, of Good, of God and as a consequence laicising the State" and of the Church through "Democritisation of The Church by means of a collegial government in opposition to the hierarchical and monarchical constitution given to Her by Our Lord. The Laicisation of Society, that brings to life once more the cry of the Jews at the death of Jesus refusing to accept His social Kingship and not even recognising in Him the Supreme Legislator of human society."

Pope Gregory’s statement on the Anti-Council, however, is more succinct and before the fact, not after the fact.

As Our Lady of La Salette characterised her children of these our sad times: ‘those who can see’ – please consider this well.

Pope Gregory’s many interventions during the Council were all directed to block progress and promote the passage of conservative statements.

Pope Gregory stated that the Vatican II Council (Roncalli’s Anti-Council) was a terrible suffering for him. He termed the Council "the greatest mistake in history" as documented in the book by Benny Lai, The Unelected Pope: Giuseppi Siri, Cardinal of the Holy Roman Church (1993:296-97)

The UPI reported more than 10 years after Vatican II that ‘Cardinal Siri suffered from a (first time ever) nervous condition specifically at the Council. In one instance he stated: "in any case, when I saw how fierce the attack was on the primacy of Peter, I prepared an intervention. I was ill. I suffered from spells of dizziness and I was unable to read and speak at the same time. Just as I began speaking, an attack came and I collapsed."

Was he drugged? Poisoned at the Anti Council? Our Lady of La Salette said there would be attempts on the life of the ‘suffering pope.’

No one can say. This does, however, remind me of another collapse in relation to the prophesied attack upon the Primacy of Peter. ("Where the See of Blessed Peter and the Chair of Truth have been set up for the light of the gentiles, there they have placed the throne of the abomination of their wickedness, so that, the Pastor having been struck" – Pope Leo XIII)

‘Those of you who can see’, please consider this well.

"Finally, in mid-October, 1943, Bishop de Silva made up his mind. He wrote to Sr. Lucia [of the Immaculate Heart], giving her the express order that she had besought of him: to write down the Third Confidence of Our Lady of Fatima. However, new difficulties would arise. Sister Lucy experienced at that time, for almost three months, a mysterious and terrible anguish. She has related that each time she sat down at her worktable and took up her pen in order to write down the Secret, she found herself obstructed from doing it. Guessing what a terrible weapon this great prophecy could set up against his dominion over souls and his plan to penetrate the very heart of the Church, such a trial endured by the seer thus indicated the magnitude of the grandiose event which was about to be carried out, should the Secret be put down on paper. On Christmas Eve, Sister Lucy confided to her director that she had still been unable to obey the order that she had been given.

"Finally, on the 2nd of January, 1944, (this is very little known) the Blessed Virgin Mary Herself appeared again to Lucy. She confirmed to her that such was truly the Will of God and gave her the light and the strength to accomplish the writing that had been commanded." (The Third Secret Revealed- Bro Michael of the Holy Trinity. Part One.)

Congruent isn’t it, this collapse over The Pastor having been struck.

It is unthinkable to John Vennari that Cardinal Siri was truly the hidden and suffering pope of both history and prophecy. But it is thinkable to him that John XXIII, a Freemason, could be pope. The Holy Office had kept a file on Angelo Roncalli since 1925 – "suspected of Modernism." He had Masonic affiliations. The Grand Master of the Italian Grand Orient claimed he had been initiated into a Masonic lodge when he was Nuncio in Paris in the decade of the 1940s. The Masons themselves extol "the Revolution of John XXIII." -Yves Marsaudon, 1964 Ecumenism As Seen By A French Freemason. (www.thepopeinred.com/thesis.htm)

It is unthinkable to John Vennari that if Pope Gregory XVII were the true pope, then he would never have signed the Council decrees. Yet he stated: "We will not be bound by these decrees." ‘Those who can see’ please note the royal ‘We’ in the Holy Father’s statement. This is the way the Popes of old would speak. Another important clue that his signature was coerced and that his own authority took precedence over the anti-papacy and the anti- council.

It is unthinkable to John Vennari that if Pope Gregory XVII was the true pope, he would have adopted the reforms of the Anti-Council, celebrated the Novus Ordo Missae, ordained priests in the New Rite, and consecrated bishops in the New Rite. But it is thinkable to John Vennari that the man who substituted a new modernist religion for the ancient faith, new sacraments and extinguished the sacrament of Orders under the Seal of the Fisherman’s Ring, was the true Pope.

The Pope In Red website cites evidence that Pope Gregory XVII resisted all of this.

Walter Matt's Remnant Newspaper reported that in Genoa (where Pope Gregory presided as Cardinal Archbishop in official capacity) churches looked the same in 1989 as they had in 1940. (Priests offered mass facing the altars with no conciliar Masonic table of the book in sight). There is evidence he covertly ordained priests for the Church in eclipse. As the sacrament of Orders had been extinguished in the Novus Ordo, the significance of this can hardly be understated. However, it is also clear that he had great remorse over the compromises that he made to fulfill the goals of his papacy.

Paragraph 11. Vennari’s question (paragraph 11): ‘Why would he in any way submit to this destructive Council if he knew it to be the work of papal imposters?"

11.A: The work of the Council is not merely the work of papal impostors but the work of specific agencies for the rulers of this present age of darkness (Eph 6:12). It was a part of a great net and strategem which John Vennari well documents in The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita: a Masonic Blueprint for the Subversion of the Church. But this is a real question and it is to John Vennari’s credit that he can at least raise it. I would not claim to have the answer to this question. What we do have is both sacred pattern and precedent.

In Gethsemane the disciples (before they fled) were inclined to confront the soldiers of the Sanhedrin who sought the life of Our Lord.

11.B: They chose to follow the course commended by Vennari in his praise of Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop Castro Mayer of the Diocese of Campos. Where is the work they founded and supported with their Episcopal authority now? The SSPX is hopelessly compromised in the un-Catholic position of recognising a "de jure" pope and resisting his magisterium – promulgated under the seal of the Fisherman’s Ring. This is no more a legitimate Catholic position than that Vatican II is the magisterium of the Catholic Church; a magisterium that Archbishop Lefebvre stated was "riddled with Masonic errors." There is no such thing as a magisterium of Holy Church riddled with Masonic errors. To think otherwise is frankly heretical

11.C: "As my statements show, I accept everything that, in the Council and in the reforms, is in full agreement with tradition... Our seminary corresponds completely to the desires expressed at the Council... The success of our seminaries among the youth makes it completely clear we are not sclerotics (inflexible), but that we are completely adapted to the necessities of the apostolate of our time." (Letter from Marcel Lefebvre, former Archbishop of Tulle, Encone, to (antipope) Paul VI. December 3, 1976).

Paragraph 13. "Only one event could have given credence to the Siri Thesis: if Cardinal Siri had resigned his office immediately after the 1958 election. The case of Msgr. Joseph Clifford Fenton at Vatican II comes to mind."

13-16A: The disciples who fled the Garden of Gethsemane followed the course commended by Vennari in his praise of Msgr. Joseph Clifford Fenton, the editor of the American Ecclesiastical Review in the 1950’s. When informed by the Sons of the Widow Cardinal Bea and Father John Courtney Murray that Fr. Murray’s position would become the teaching of Vatican II, "Msgr. Fenton immediately returned from Rome and resigned as Ed. of the AER, allegedly for health reasons." He fled. "He virtually disappeared and died in New England in 1969." This is a sad story. And it is precisely the type of response to the overthrow of the Chair of Peter and the establishment of the antipapacy that the Sion Dynasts and their Illuminist orders and lodges would want. I am sure the Sons of the Widow who succeeded in the 1958 coup d’etat were pleased not to have an adversary in Msgr Fenton.

Paragraph 17. "If this is how Msgr. Fenton behaved when confronted with a grave crisis of conscience, what must we expect from Cardinal Siri when faced with a crisis of infinitely greater magnitude? Cardinal Siri did not resign; he remained in visible communion with the post-1958 popes until his death."

Indeed. As the true pope de jure, Pope Gregory XVII made sacrifices that required much sterner stuff than the resignation of Msgr. Fenton for reasons of ill health.

For this was the hour of the mystical passion of Holy Church.

"I have lived a very long life, and I have known men... and traitors. But I have never revealed the names of the traitors. I do not perform the work of the executioner. I know, however, how much it costs to speak the truth. They have not succeeded in making me ill, but they have succeeded in making me sad and depressed. But Jeremiah had enough lamentations; there's no need for me to add to them." (Words of "Cardinal Siri" 30 Days Magazine January 17, 1985 A.D.)

The disciples could not drink of the chalice (Matt 20:22; Mark 10:38) that Our Lord had prayed would pass from Him in His agony in the garden, but in the end He agreed with His Father: ‘Thy will be done." He would drink of that chalice. (John 18:11) But then, when the Prince of this World had come, he had nothing in Our Lord and he had nothing in the Immaculate. Even so, Our Lord prophesied about His apostles: "Ye shall drink indeed of my chalice." (Matt 20:23; Mark 10:39) because He knew The Sanctifier would come.

If Gregory XVII was the true pontiff de jure; it is not unthinkable that under the shadow of the eclipse of the Church, alone with Our Lord in the Garden, he would choose to follow this pattern of Our Lord’s submission in the service of ends that only Our Lord in His Divine Soul could understand. Of the sacrifice of the "suffering pope" to whom she referred at La Salette, Our Lady said: "I will be with him to receive his sacrifice." She means the sacrifice of a Pope who knew he himself to be presiding over the Mystical Passion of Holy Church.

Paragraph 12. "…Siri repeatedly refers to ‘Pope Paul VI’, something no honest man would do who knew himself to be the true Pope."

A more important judgement over the decisions and actions of the true pope are the words: "Ye shall drink indeed of my chalice." Let John Vennari make of this what he will. And yes, I believe that Cardinal Siri as Pope Gregory XVII was the sovereign pontiff when he wrote Gethsemane. His reference to Pope Paul VI is a reference to a de facto Pope who is a de jure antipope. And for his edification, he bears witness to his errors and his betrayal of the Magisterium of Holy Church.

Paragraphs 19. Cardinal Ottaviani is also praised for his actions. "The Siri Thesis becomes even more untenable when we consider that Cardinal Ottaviani did not want modernist theologians present at Vatican II but only allowed them because of John XXIII’s insistance."

19.A: That should be at Pope John XXIII's insistence to John Vennari. I agree that Cardinal Ottaviani was right and honest to object to Modernist theologians at the Vatican II Council. According to the Magisterium of the Catholic Church, Modernism is the sum of all heresies. But, recognising antipope John XXIII as the de jure pope, Cardinal Ottaviani was faced with a choice between the decision of his pope against the Church and the Magisterium of the Church. He deferred to his pope. How exactly does this make The Siri Thesis untenable?

Paragraph 22. "It makes no sense for Cardinal Ottaviani to carry out an order so destructive to the Church unless he felt obliged to do so through obedience to the Pope. But if he knew that [should be Pope] John XXIII [to John Vennari] was not Pope anyway, because of dirty dealings at the 1958 Conclave, he would have no reason to tolerate these suspect theologians at the Council."

22.A: Well they were hardly suspect. Modernism, the sum of all heresies, was represented by name at the Vatican II Council: Rahner, Chenu, Lubac, Kung, et al. The peritii Cardinal Ottaviani rightly wished to exclude reads like a "Who’s Who" of the Index. Has it not occurred to John Vennari that Cardinal Ottaviani, bound by the Secret of the 1958 Conclave, knew that antipope John XXIII was not the pope and collaborated with him under duress and not just because he was bound by the Secret? And how about the historic and well-known photo of Antipope Paul VI walking in procession - giving away the sacred Papal Tiara (literally fulfilling the Prophecy of Premol of the breaking of the Tiara) to the Masonic UN-- who is to the papal imposter's right? But, in all fairness, a mortified Cardinal Ottaviani. (view photo) Put it another way, what did Cardinal Bea and the B’nai B’rith have on Cardinal Ottaviani?

Does the author of The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita have no concept of what a Masonic revolution looks like?

As previously stated, Cardinal Ottaviani is oft cited in the pages of CFN because of his famous statement regarding the Third Secret of Fatima. So Vennari is at least aware that what passes for ‘the great façade’ in the pages of CFN is in fact the Great Apostasy.

Writing of the universal testimony of the early Fathers of the Church concerning precisely those times, Henry Edward Cardinal Manning writes:

"The apostasy of the city of Rome from the vicar of Christ and its destruction by Antichrist may be thoughts so new to many Catholics, that I think it well to recite the text of theologians of greatest repute. First Malvenda, who writes expressly on the subject, states as the opinion of Ribera, Gaspar Melus, Biegas, Suarrez, Bellarmine and Bosius that Rome shall apostatise from the faith, drive away the Vicar of Christ and return to its ancient paganism. Malvenda’s words are: ‘But Rome itself in the last times of the world will return to its ancient idolatry, power and imperial greatness. It will cast out its Pontiff, altogether apostatise from the Christian faith, terribly persecute the Church, shed the blood of martyrs more cruelly than ever and will recover its former state of abundant wealth, or even greater than it had under its first rulers." -Henry Edward Cardinal Manning, The Present Crisis of the Holy See, 1861. London: Burns and Lambert. Pp. 89-90.

So, if we are living through the times of the Great Apostasy (according to Cardinal Ottaviani), then according to the universal testimony of the early Fathers of the Church, Rome has cast out its Pontiff and altogether apostasised from the faith. Well, the invitation of Modernist theologians to the Vatican Council II is certainly evidence that the sum of all heresies was well represented at the Council. So again, how exactly does this make The Siri Thesis so untenable? Or does it rather confirm it according to the universal testimony of the Early Fathers of the Church?

But this gets worse. Under the antipapacy we do see Rome returning to its pantheon (ecumenism) and building the new world order through the Club of Rome and the EU. Anitpope Benedict XVI has "announced" that ‘the Church’ now has a mission to the world with Jews (who deny that Our Lord has come in the flesh). Through ostpolitik, the antipapacy betrayed the Catholics behind the Iron Curtain where arguably more blood has been shed for the faith than in all the centuries of the Church. Yet it is unthinkable to John Vennari that Rome has cast out the Pontiff of the Catholic Church. Such a failure to grasp even the most basic facts by the author of The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita demonstrates that he has no grasp of his own subject matter, let alone the matter of the Hidden Papacy.

Paragraph 18. "Lastly if the "Siri Thesis" were true, then every Cardinal at the 1958 conclave is implemented [that probably should be implicated] in the swindle."

18.A: Exactly. The truth will out. Even in John Vennari’s telling slip of the pen "every Cardinal at the 1958 conclave is implemented." – calls to mind the intention of The Permanent Instruction to instrumentalise the Church for the purposes of the Masonic world agenda.

This does not refute The Siri Thesis. It gives the greatest possible import to Pope Gregory’s statement: "the secret is horrible." And shouldn’t that remind us of Fr. Malachi Martin’s oft quoted comment on the Third Secret of Fatima. "It is horrible, the worst you can imagine – and then some." The words of Sr. Lucia of Fatima to Fr. Fuentes (Dec. 26, 1957) should be placed in this context. "Father, the devil is in the mood for engaging in a decisive battle against the Blessed Virgin. And the devil knows what it is that most offends God and which in short space of time will gain for him the greatest number of souls…my mission is not to indicate to the world the material punishments that are certain to come if the world does not pray and do penance beforehand. No! My mission is to indicate to everyone the imminent danger we are in of losing our souls for all eternity…" The year was 1957 and the Oct. 1958 conclave was less than a year away.

If this is the worst that Vennari can imagine, I think he has hit the nail square on the head in spite of himself; and then some.

And then, through the suicide of "changing" the Faith of the Church and Her Sacred Liturgy (against which Pope Pius XII warned), the antipapacy would extinguish the sacraments: first the sacrament of Holy Orders, then the sacrament of the Mass. Through the Novus Ordo Missae, the antipapacy would change the consecration of the wine in order to bring the Church – all professing Catholics seeking to persevere in their holy faith and in obedience to the Roman Pontiff – under the solemn anathemas of Trent.

By what criteria, or upon which precedent, could the sacrifice of the submission of the sovereign pontiff of the Catholic Church to his enemies be understood – exiled from Rome, at the mercy of his enemies? ("They can kill me at any time.")

It is a fact that Pope Gregory offered the canonised Roman Rite of immemorial Tradition. He offered the sacrifice at the time when the sacrament of the altar was being extinguished in the Novus Ordo Missae, when the Catholic world in communion with the antipapacy was being brought under the anathema of the Council of Trent.

De Fide is liturgically set forth in the most sacred possession of Holy Church, as it was developed from the institution of Christ and the Apostles and canonised in perpetuity at the Council of Trent. According to the Catechism of Trent, the basic words of the institution themselves are Christ's own. For the consecration of The Wine, they are:


The Catechism infallibly instructs us that: the words "Of the New Testament" have been added that we might understand the blood of Christ the Lord to be given not under a figure as was done in the Old Law, of which we read in the Epistle to the Hebrews that without the blood a testament is not dedicated; but to be given to men in truth and in reality, as becomes the New Testament. Hence, the Apostle says: Christ therefore is the mediator of the New Testament, that by means of his death, they who are called may receive the promise of eternal inheritance."…"The additional words for you and for many ‘PRO MULTIS’ are taken, some from Matthew, some from Luke, but were joined together by the Catholic Church under the guidance of the Spirit of God. They serve to declare the fruit and advantage of His Passion. For if we look to its value, we must confess that the Redeemer shed His blood for the salvation of all; but if we look to the fruit which mankind has received from it, we shall easily find that it pertains not unto all, but to many of the human race. When therefore, Our Lord said: "For you:" he meant either those who were present or those chosen from among the Jewish people, such as were the disciples with whom He was speaking (with the exception of Judas). When He added, "And for many" He wished to be understood to mean the remainder of the elect from among the Gentiles."

"With reason, therefore, were the words "for all’ [as used in the Novus Ordo Missae] not used, as in this place the fruits of the Passion are alone spoken of, and to the elect only did His Passion bring the fruit of salvation. And this is the purport of the Apostle when he says: ‘Christ was offered once to exhaust the sins of many; and also the words of Our Lord in John: ‘I pray not for the world, but for them whom Thou hast given me, because they are Thine."

Thus the dogma of the Faith of Holy Church affirms the words of the consecration of The Wine in the Latin Rite. The Novus Ordo Missae removes the Mystery of Faith [MYSTERIUM FIDEI] in the consecration. This now becomes the proclamation of the faithful as in: "Let us proclaim the mystery of faith. Christ has died. Christ is risen. Christ will come again." Whereas according to Trent, the sacrament of His blood is the MYSTERIUM FIDEI. And the church of the Novus Ordo specifically consecrates the chalice of the Sacrament of His Blood ‘for all’ thus placing itself under the anathema of Trent. This consecration is becoming the basis of the emergent ecumenical church of all faiths and nations. Also anathema through the blasphemy of the MYSTERIUM FIDEI. (Apoc 18:1-3)

"Never, never will a storm have been so strong against any other Pontiff. He is already a martyr before undergoing martyrdom. He is suffering before the hour has come. But he offers his own person and the blood of his veins for all his torturers and for those who are making terrible attempts upon his life. How many exiles to be suffered!" (Revelation of Maria Julia Jahenny, d. 1941 A.D.)With Ecclesiastical Approval

For this reason do I say that the hidden pope offered the immemorial sacrifice in the Latin Rite at the time when the sacrament of the altar was being extinguished and the Catholic world was coming under the anathema of Trent through their communion with the antipapacy.

It is possible that in his official and public capacity as Cardinal Archbishop of Genoa, Pope Gregory was compelled to offer the Novus Ordo Missae. If so, it is not unreasonable to think that he made a sacrifice of submission to the de facto papacy (the de jure antipapacy) and offered the *new mass. He was a hostage to the Masonic order (this would be the pyramidion of Masonry) in control of the Vatican. It is reasonable to suppose that under this degree of scrutiny, the performance of his public duties in terms of the new order was mandatory.

If Pope Gregory offered the Novus Ordo Missae, *it certainly would have been possible for him to substitute the true and immemorial consecration of the chalice for the new consecration. The altars of his archdiocese were placed correctly. There was no Masonic table of the Book of the Law against the true altar of sacrifice. The "Hic est enim calix…" is spoken with the priest facing the altar and bowed over the chalice. I think there is every reason to believe that even if he was coerced into saying the new mass, he could make a true consecration of the host.

And it will be objected that Pope Gregory offered the new mass in his official capacity. He was under a documented death threat for 31 years. Let us say that for the sake of argument, he discharged his public duty as ordered and said the new mass of the antipapacy. As alluded to above, why could it not be thought that in this action the supreme pontiff "obeyed" exteriorly, with the pure intention of making intercession for the Church in this hour of Her mystical passion? Pope Gregory’s mass would have been the pontifical mass. Why could it not be possible to believe that as the Catholic world was passing under the anathema of Trent, the value of the souls being lost weighed upon the pastoral heart of the Holy Father? Why would it not be possible to believe that the true sacrifice was within him and prevailed?

As the Cardinal Archbishop and rector of the seminary in Genoa, he had more latitude to teach the Canonised Rite whether secretly or openly and to ordain valid priests and hierarchy for the Traditional Rite and the needs of Holy Church. Clearly this legacy was the reason for his papacy in exile.

"I see the Holy Father in great distress. He lives in another palace and receives only a few in his presence. If the wicked party know their own great strength, they would even now have made an attack. I fear the Holy Father will suffer many tribulations before his death, for I see the black counterfeit church gaining ground, I see its fatal influence on the public. The distress of the Holy Father and of the Church is really so great that one ought to pray to God day and night. I have been told to pray much for the Church and the Pope...The people must pray earnestly for the extirpation (Rooting out, destruction) of the dark church." -Prophetic Vision of Anne Catherine Emmerich (1774-1824 A.D.) Augustinian Nun, Stigmatist from the book, The Life of Anne Catherine Emmerich, by Very Rev. Carl E. Schmoger, C.SS.R, Vol. ii, pages (Ibid, pages 292-293)


This pattern is in conformation with Our Lord’s sacrifice. Whether the souls at CFN believe The Siri Thesis or not, such actions of conformity to Our Lord in His Passion should at least look familiar whether they place stock in it or not.

John Vennari should think upon this well before resorting to epithets such as scoundrel in relation to Pope Gregory XVII’s sacrifice of submission to the antipapacy.

As Our Lady said at La Salette: "I will be with him at the end to receive his sacrifice." But neither he nor his successor would live to see the triumph of the Church of God. So there were successors consecrated for the needs of Holy Church at this time of unprecedented crisis. Now as far as we know, the See is vacant.

I wish to seriously propose to John Vennari and the CFN writers who "place no stock in this whatsoever" that what we actually are witnessing in these our sad times is not a great façade or the need for a ‘traditional movement’ within the church. By definition there can be no such thing as ‘a traditional movement within the Church’. With Her Mark of One (the See of Peter, whether occupied presently or not) - the Church is one in Her Sacred Tradition. A Pope, so called, who busies himself with extinguishing the sacraments, inventing a new, Modernist, one-world faith based upon everything Holy Church in Her Sacred Tradition condemns as hostile to Our Lord (and this just for starters) is no more the pope than the Patriot Act is constitutional.

Of the times of the Great Apostasy when the Chair of Peter is overturned (as foreseen in Pope Leo XIII’s prophetic vision) there is much extant and authoritative literature. Holy Church is now scattered. She worships outside the jurisdiction of the antipapacy, just as she worshiped outside of the jurisdiction of the Arian bishops during the centuries of the Arian crisis.

"Then the Church shall be scattered, driven into the wilderness, and shall be for a time, as it was in the beginning, invisible hidden in catacombs, in dens, in mountains, in lurking places; for a time it shall be swept, as it were from the face of the earth. Such is the universal testimony of the Fathers of the early Church." -Henry Edward Cardinal Manning, The Present Crisis of the Holy See, 1861, London: Burns and Lambert p. 88.

Catholic Family News website features the petition, "Pope St. Pius X, champion against Modernism, pray for us!" This great Pope and Saint testified of our times:

"The Rock has always withstood the test of time. But one will be entered into the House of God. Woe to man when he places him upon the See of Peter for then the Great Day of the Lord is at hand."

What we are witnessing is the mystical passion of Holy Church: "so that the Pastor having been struck, they [the agents of AntiChrist] may be able to scatter the flock." (Pope Leo XIII Invocation of the Archangel Michael, and Matt. 26:31). We have witnessed the flight of the true pontiff and his exile from Rome (as attested by the early Fathers, by all the theologians cited by Cardinal Manning and by the Queen of Prophets at La Salette). We have witnessed the sacrifice of the Hidden Pope’s submission to the de facto authority of the antipapacy, which has power with Satan at this time of the eclipse of the Church. And the testament to his martyrdom in prophecy and in history is coming together.

Let these facts be submitted to a candid world.

At Fatima were the means revealed by which Holy Church would be exalted through the Triumph of the Immaculate: the scapular of Carmel and the Holy Rosary. These were to be the last remedies, as Sr. Lucia was to say later in her final interview Dec. 26, 1957. These were to be the means for the sanctification of Catholics in the time when the means for sanctification, which Christ willed for His Church, would be all but extinguished. So it should be as plain as plain why the antipapacy and the ecumenical movement as one hate the Queenship of Mary.

And at the Cebaco, the Archangel revealed the standard of victory: the infinite merit of the union of the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts from which unimaginable graces would flow to those who are going to stand with Holy Church in this time of Her mystical passion and the Great Apostasy.

And at Tuy, when Our Lord spoke to Sr Lucia of the Immaculate Heart of Mary about his own purposes for this time of immense trial: "I wish my Church to place the devotion to this Immaculate Heart beside the devotion to my Sacred Heart."

"The Rock has always withstood the test of time. But one will be entered into the House of God. Woe to man when he places him upon the See of Peter for then, the Great Day of the Lord is at hand." Pope St. Pius X

"Arise then, O Invincible Prince"


Minneapolis, MN from The Editor and Staff of In Today's Catholic World, September 19th, 2006 A.D.
The 160th year Anniversary of the Apparition of the Blessed Virgin on the Mountain of La Salette, France (September, 19, 1846 A.D.)

"Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist... The Church will be in eclipse..."
(Words spoken by Our Lady of La Salette to Melanie Calvat in 1846 A.D., a fully approved Church Apparition)

Pray For True Papal Restoration!

Catholic Radio Podcast Online
TCW Radio

Click to listen to a special radio (podcast) interview on True Papal Restoration (13:55 min.)

© In Today's Catholic World (TCW) 2005-2013 All rights reserved.

(September 17, Fifteenth Sunday after Pentecost)

(The Holy Stigmata of St Francis, C)

Anti Catholic Italian Freemasons
Pictures of the 19th Century Evil Italian Freemasons Giuseppe Garibaldi and Victor Emmanuel.
These agents of Satan stole the Papal States: purposely paving the way for the Antipopes

"According to St. Malachy, then, only ten, or at most eleven, popes remain to be in future more or less legitimately elected. We say more or less legitimately elected, because out of those future popes it is to be feared that one or two will be unlawfully elected as anti-popes. ... Besides some predictions announcing this deplorable event, many powerful and influential persons in Europe are at present agreed and determined to use all their efforts to elect an anti-pope, in order to produce a schism in the Church, and to have a man who will favor their impious designs against the Catholic religion ... it has been asserted that the government of Berlin, under the arch-schemer Bismarck, has made overtures on this subject to some European governments, and especially to that of Victor Emmanuel in Italy. It is known that the old apostate Döllinger, with his associates in Germany, and the apostate ex-Friar Hyacinthe Loyson, and a few others in France, with Gavazzi and others in Italy, are engaged in preparing the way to the approaching advent of an anti-pope." -The Christian Trumpet, Fr. Gaudentius Rossi, 1878 A.D.

In Today's Catholic World (TCW)
September 17, 2006 A.D.

(Minneapolis) -Sept 17- TCW is reprinting an extremely important, brief article by the Monsieur l'Abbe' Henri Mouraux entitled, The Hidden But Victorious Way Of The Free-Masonry, which first appeared in the publication Bonum Certamen No. 74 of July/August 1984 A.D. (Note: this excellent expose on Freemasonry was written more than 20 years ago- and it could be inferred by the evidence presented by the author that he rejects the V-2 phony authorities - yet - this is not precisely stated - of course the Vatican II sect "popes" are criminal usurpers that must be tossed out! An additional note: all pictures and their accompanying captions were added by TCW.)

Monsieur l'Abbe' Henri Mouraux
69, rue du Marechal Oudinot
F - 54000 Nancy FRANCE

Since 28 April 1738, a series of Popes have condemned free-masonry, which they called the “Synagogue of Satan”, in ten encyclicals. They excommunicated the Christians who adhered to it. But nonetheless free-masonry intruded into the Church and even arrived at her highest point. During his nunciature in Turkey, for instance, the late John XXIII was admitted in 1935 “into the Sect of the Temple” and received the name of “Brother John”, as Pier Carpi claims in his book “Prophecies of John XXIII”, page 52.

Freemason Roncalli
Angelo Roncalli (the future Antipope John XIII) pictured in Turkey c. 1935 A.D.
Roncalli, during his nunciature in Turkey, incurred ipso facto (automatic) excommunication when he joined the sect of Freemasonry.

The free-masons of the Temple, usually called “Rosicrucians”, see in Christ only an extraordinary man. They deny however his divinity which-as they assert-the Church had attributed to him, in order to falsify his mission, which was only a social one. Like a confirmation of Pier Carpi’s words, Carl Jakob Burckhardt, a high-degree free-mason, wrote in the JOURNAL DE GENEVE: "I know Cardinal Roncalli very well. He was a Deist and a Rationalist whose strength did not lie in the ability to believe in miracles and to venerate the sacred.”

Let’s now open the book “Resurgence du Temple”, a work which has been edited by the Templers themselves in 1975. On page 149 I read: “The direction of our action: continuation of the work of John XXIII and all of those who have followed him on the way to the templer universalime.” Let’s furthermore add that during the time of his nunciature in Paris, to the greatest astonishment of the Police who had been given to him for his protection as a Diplomat, Cardinal Roncalli attended in civilian clothes the Great Lodge where he found again the Jesuit Riquet. His adviser was Maurice Bredet, author of “Mystic and Magic,” who boasted that he had prophesied the Tiara to Cardinal Roncalli.

Siri Against Montini
"Cardinal Siri" in 1967 A.D., (in the front left corner of picture) is shown to be angry at the imposter "pope" Montini,
while all the others around him "Siri" (A.K.A. Pope Gregory XVII) generously applaud the usurper: Antipope Paul VI

During the Conclave after the death of John XXIII, white smoke announced the election of a Pope. (Interestingly Fr. Mouraux is speaking about the 1963 Conclave here and white smoke seen. Of course most true Catholics know about the famous 1958 white smoke where "Cardinal" Siri was elected Pope and 100% accepted. Pope Siri walked into the 63 Conclave the Pope de jure and walked out of the conclave the (hidden and persecuted) Pope. -TCW) Today it is known that Cardinal Siri, a spiritual friend of Pius XII, had just been elected with a majority of votes. But what happened afterwards? It is not known exactly. It is however certain that (in 1963) Cardinal Tisserant, in disregard of the Rules of the Conclave, left the locked rooms, went into town where he had a secret meeting with the dignitaries of the Lodge B’nai B’rith (Free-masonry lodge, founded in 1953 in the USA) which is mostly reserved to Jews. Some hours after his return to the Vatican, another white smoke announced the election of Cardinal Montini. At his coronation as Pope Paul VI, several American newspapers accused him of being a member of the Lodge B’nai B’rith - a photograph served as proof - (which is in my possession; the author).

"Cardinal" Capovilla was behind a plot against the holy Padre Pio

Did they do this in order to silence the rumors about John XXIII which had been circulated at the request of Cardinal Ottoviani or simply to answer the American newspapers? Nobody has revealed this. But on 24 July 1970 the OSSERVATORE ROMANO in its No. 30 recalled the Order of the Templers had always been condemned... While thus the facade remained intact, the mole work would continue. According to the paper SELECTION, during the Council Paul VI encouraged in the neighborhood of Cardinal Lienart his friend Capovilla, a prelate, who played the role of an intriguer against Padre Pio, to attack Cardinal Ottoviani. Now the German paper EINSICHT, in its February number of 1984, page 212, has revealed the free-masonry career of Lienart who was received in the Lodge of Cambrai 1912: Visitor 1919, 30th Grade 1927.

The Infamous 1980s Vatican II Sect's Worldwide Masonic Bank Scandal
(1.) Corpse of Roberto Calvi (2.) "Pope" John Paul II admiring "Archbishop" Marcinkus: head of the "Vatican" Bank (3.) "Cardinal" Casaroli
Info on murdered Freemason Roberto Calvi, member of the Grand Orient of Italy Lodge 'P2', who laundered money for the Vatican II Sect:
Calvi's bank Banco Ambrosiano built its empire in close association with the "Vatican" bank, the Institute for Religious Works (IOR). This (the IOR) was headed by "Archbishop" Paul Marcinkus from Chicago, who also ran the Banco Ambrosiano Overseas in the Bahamas from Chicago. Marcinkus was indicted in Italy in 1982 as an accessory in the 3.5-billion-dollar collapse of Banco Ambrosiano, however, he was never arrested because his "Vatican" status gave him immunity from prosecution in Italy. (Marcinkus died 02/21/06 -TCW). While the "Vatican" never accepted culpability in the collapse of Ambrosiano, it stumped up $250m to creditors. Regarding the Freemason Calvi: he was a haunted man as he entered his final days. As chairman of Banco Ambrosiano, he was in charge of an organization that laundered money made largely from the heroin trade for the mafia. He knew the dark financial *secrets of the "Vatican". *(In May 1988, Judge Mario Almerighi, in the process of preparing the case against a gang of importers of hashish and heroin, found among the material that had been seized in a police raid, correspondence addressed to one of the highest officials in the "Vatican" Curia-- the Secretary of State of the "Vatican", "Cardinal" Agostino *Casaroli. Two of the letters asked the "Vatican" for 1.5 billion lire (or about $1 million) to reimburse the drug smuggler for funds he had advanced to Flavio Carboni to acquire documents written by Calvi. When he (Judge Mario Almerighi) checked with postal authorities, he found, to his astonishment, that both letters had been sent by registered mail and signed for by an official in the "Cardinal's" office.) Letters of comfort to offshore companies which he (Calvi) created were signed by the head of the "Vatican" Bank "Archbishop" Marcinkus. After fleeing Italy in 1982 "Brother" Calvi was found hanging under London's Blackfriars Bridge (one of the symbols used by Italian Freemasonry being a Black Friar), his pockets stuffed with 13 lbs., of bricks and rocks (i.e. masonry), his feet dangling in the ebb and flow of the tide (another Masonic inference from their infamous Secrecy Penalty Blood Oaths).

Because John Paul I wished to make an end to the notorious financial transactions between Marcinkus and Calvi, the free-mason who was master of the situation through *Casaroli, member of the Lodge P2 (Casaroli's Masonic code # was 41-076 - his code name "CASA" - he was also a major player in/for the Talmudic cryptic cult Opus Dei -TCW), made him disappear: Surprisingly came the “strange death of John Paul I”, poisoned by Aqua Toffana (a colorless, tasteless liquid poison consisting it seems of arsenic and possibly belladonna -TCW), as described by J.J. Thiery (on page 153 of his discoveries).

Antipope John Paul II smiling with Jewish Freemasons
Antipope John Paul II shown smiling with members of B'nai B'rith (Jewish Freemasons) March 2, 1984

And what was not less strange: the only witness of this “strange death”, another free-mason prelate - identified as such after his death (through the works in his library) - died a few months later also rather suddenly. John Paul II had abolished the excommunication which for 145 years had hit the Catholics belonging to free-masonry. On 2 March 1984 he received in official audience the Lodge B’nai B’rith. The speech which he addressed to them is a startling confirmation of all that has been written before. [...] Addressing himself to the worst enemies of the Church, John Paul II calls them three times, during his amiable speech “my dear friends”. After emphasizing the “fraternal interest”, he continued: “We are called up to unite us”. And this reunion is not just an ordinary one, but of “Brothers”. In order to underline its deepness and religiosity, John Paul II cited Psalm 132: “Oh! Qu’il est bon, qu’il est doux pour des freres unis d’habiter ensemble.” (Behold how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity.) In any case, this brotherhood is for him a source of pleasure: “I am truly happy to receive you. I do thank you. (...) I am grateful to you.” These statements are not the expression of a fleeting sentiment, no, they manifest the “close relations of his visitors to the (so-called) Commission for the Religious (!) Relations”.

In conclusion, a ‘normal’ consequence among “Brothers” which in itself is already blasphemous: "We are called up to unite us in a gesture of gratitude towards God.”

"Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist... The Church will be in eclipse..."
(-Words spoken by Our Lady of La Salette to Melanie Calvat in 1846 A.D., a fully approved Church Apparition)

Pray For True Papal Restoration!

© In Today's Catholic World (TCW) 2005-2013 All rights reserved.

(September 8, The Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary)

(Double of II Class with simple Octave)

The Birth of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary

"Rejoice, O earth, because from the womb of Anna, as from a fertile vine, has sprung a sweet ripe cluster.
To the harvesting of this vineyard all are invited, none are excluded - it is the joy of all." -St. John Damascene

In Today's Catholic World (TCW)
September 8, 2006 A.D.

(Minneapolis) -September 8- In honor of the sacred feast of The Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary, TCW is posting a beautiful Litany composed by St. John Eudes which extolls the greatness of this precious Gift (Our Lady) - that Divine Charity bestowed upon an undeserving world: whose trusting and humble "Yes" to the Angel, gave our lost race a second chance.

Litany in Honor of the Holy Infancy of The Blessed Virgin

by St. John Eudes

Lord, have mercy on us,

Christ, have mercy on us,

Lord, have mercy on us,

Infant Jesus, hear us,

Infant Jesus, graciously hear us,

God the Father of heaven,

God the Son, Redeemer of the World,

God the Holy Ghost,

Holy Infant Mary,

Infant Daughter of the Father,

Infant, Mother of the Son,

Infant, Spouse of the Holy Ghost,

Infant, fruit of the prayers of thy parents,

Infant, Sanctuary of the Holy Trinity,

Infant, riches of thy father,

Infant, delight of thy mother,

Infant, honor of thy father,

Infant, honor of thy mother,

Infant, miracle of nature,

Infant, prodigy of grace,

Immaculate in thy Conception,

Most holy in thy Nativity,

Most devout in thy Presentation,

Masterpiece of God's grace,

Aurora of the Sun of Justice,

Beginning of our joy,

End of our evils,

Infant, joy of earth,

Pattern of our charity,

Model of our humility,

Lord, have mercy on us.

Christ, have mercy on us.

Lord, have mercy on us.

Have mercy on us.

Have mercy on us.

Have mercy on us.

Have mercy on us.

Have mercy on us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Infant, most powerful,

Infant, most mild,

Infant, most pure,

Infant, most obedient,

Infant, most poor,

Infant, most meek,

Infant, most amiable,

Infant, most admirable,

Infant, incomparable,

Infant, health of the sick,

Comfortess of the afflicted,

Refuge of Sinners,

Hope of Christians,

Lady of the Angels,

Daughter of the Patriarchs,

Desire of the Prophets,

Mistress of the Apostles,

Strength of Martyrs,

Glory of the Priesthood,

Joy of Confessors,

Purity of Virgins,

Queen of all Saints,

Infant, our Mother,

Infant, Queen of our hearts,

Lamb of God, Who takest away the sins of the world,

Lamb of God, Who takest away the sins of the world,

Lamb of God, Who takest away the sins of the world,

Infant Jesus,

Infant Jesus,

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Pray for us.

Spare us, Infant Jesus.

Graciously hear us, Infant Jesus.

Have mercy on us, Infant Jesus.

Hear us.

Graciously hear us.

Maria Bambina
The Infant Maria


O almighty and merciful God, Who through the cooperation of the Holy Ghost, didst prepare the body and soul of the Immaculate Infant Mary that she might be the worthy Mother of Thy Son, and didst preserve her from all stain, grant that we who venerate with all our hearts her most holy childhood, may be freed, through her merits and intercession, from all uncleanness of mind and body, and be able to imitate her perfect humility, obedience and charity. Through Christ Our Lord. Amen.

St. John Eudes Lover of Innocence, Ora Pro Nobis

© In Today's Catholic World (TCW) 2005-2013 All rights reserved.

(September 3, Thirteenth Sunday after Pentecost Semidouble - St. Pius X, PC)

Narcissus Adored Himself
1598-99 A.D.

Bl. Rembordt (18th century). "God will punish the world when men have devised marvellous inventions that will lead them to forgetting God. They will have horseless carriages, and they will fly like birds. But they will laugh at the idea of God, thinking that they are 'very clever.' There will be signs from heaven, but men, in their pride, will laugh them off. Men will indulge in voluptuousness, and lewd fashions will be seen. ... These things will come when they set up a new kingdom of Christ from which the true faith will be banished." (Catholic Prophecy, The Coming Chastisement by Yves Dupont)

In Today's Catholic World (TCW)
September 3, 2006 A.D.

(Minneapolis) -September 3- The first work the Editor of TCW had come across from The Veritas Staff was their wonderful and very important piece Death Blows to Vatican Council II. TCW recently found another key article/work from the talented Veritas Staff written in 1998 A.D., which further critiques and exposes to all, the soul killing V-2 sect antipopes and their "feel good religion" entitled: Is Sacrifice Necessary? (Note: all pictures & captions were added by TCW)

Is Sacrifice Necessary?

By The Veritas Staff

St. Gemma Galgani bore the marks of the holy stigmata
St. Gemma Galgani bore the Marks of the Holy Stigmata
St. Gemma’s Guardian Angel would frequently appear to her When meditating on the Passion of Our Lord, her Angel would
inspire her with the most sublime insights into this mystery. Her Guardian Angel once spoke to her regarding Christ’s Agonies:

“Look at what Jesus has suffered for man. Consider one by one these Wounds. It is Love that has opened them all.
See how execrable (horrible) sin is, since to expiate it, so much pain and so much love have been necessary.”

"It is natural to mankind to make sacrificial offerings to the Omnipotent God.  Man is incited to do so by a natural instinct without any express command or special injunction," says St. Thomas Aquinas.

Not only is this instinctive desire to offer sacrifice found in all men (up to the time of the "Reformation"), but the desire is satisfied only when the Sacrifice is offered to the Deity: firstly, as an outward manifestation of our Worship, praise, honor, veneration and highest esteem for and to Him: and secondly, with the object of attaining Communion with Him for Supplication and Thanksgiving.  The third reason unfolds with the purpose we have in seeking and attaining this attention, this Communion, this gratification.

As Catholics, we know the missing purpose in this definition is: REPARATION FOR OUR SINS.

As to the Sacrificial Offering itself: strictly speaking, this Offering does not become a Sacrifice until a real change has been effected in the visible gift, e.g., by slaying the Victim, by the shedding of the Victim's Blood, by burning it, or pouring it out.

THREE SYSTEMS: The 3 dominant sacrificial systems of history are that of:
1) The pagan nations: and most especially those of the revealed religions of:
2) Judaism which was a preparation and a figure of:
3) The Promised Messianic Sacrifice of Christianity as Offered by the Lamb of God.

If you may say: "Stop - you have not mentioned the sacrifices of certain others" - the answer is: "pure Buddhism, Mohammedanism, and Protestantism HAVE NO REAL SACRIFICE, and so we can only call them to attention except for their lack of true and real Sacrifice, which ought make Protestants, at least, blush for shame.  Instead, a Protestant woman told one of us the other day that she did not care about the arguments going on today over the Mass as she did not want a man to offer up prayers for her.  She did not wait to hear that it is Christ Himself Who Offers up His Prayer for us.  Apart from these there is and has been no developed religion which has not accepted sacrifice as an essential portion of its cult (Catholic reference 1910).

Masonic One World Religion
Antipope John XXIII's Worldly "Gospel": A Liberty of Perdition

REVERSING THE OBJECT TO BE ADORED: The ancient Indians were perceptive of sacrifice to the point of coining this proverb: "Sacrifice is the naval of the world." Yet, they had neither humility nor submission to their deity.  They were much as the 1962-65 Robber Council and its N.O. switches the positions of God today and "little by little" ingrains this idea into the minds of its adherents and victims.  Thus, with the pagans, their gods sank to the level of mere servant of man: while man rose to the dignity one expects in the Divine.  When we read what the Council puts out as "prayers" these days, they are insults and challenges to the Divine.  As to the dignity of its followers, it is not apparent.  Also we read this "humanistic" poison every week in the mod, humanistic speeches of JP2, including re-runs of his deceased predecessor, Paul 6, printed in various V-2 supported papers which travel under the purloined title of "Catholic papers".

What Satan sold to the ancient pagans as worship he continues to market today via V-2 - he has not changed!!! Lucifer is not selling something new nor is he "up-dating" as John 23 liked to say.  The enemy has nothing new to sell.  The enemy is foisting off all his old junk via recycle.

For example, V-2ers are prone to speak of the "soul of the world" in their effort to solidify the "community spirit" or "solidarity of all humans", into a circle where a Deity is spoken of, yet closed out.

It was St. Augustine who nixed this "soul of the world" professed by Plato, called "heart of the world" by JP2 in May '89 to the "Religious" of Madagascar.  If the world did have a soul or a heart, St. Augustine asks: "Where is the body?" and "Whose body would it be?" Our intelligence or even lack of intelligence, he says, tells us that such ideas are "impious, and therefore, irreligious consequences follow".  Sure, enough, at Madagascar, JP2 ventured to push V-2 fiction as if it were part of the "Bible".  JP2 cleverly held out worldly images to these people, replacing their fears with the errors of V-2.  Even as St Augustine asked of the pagans with their secret doctrines and physical interpretations, we ask of JP2 and his V-2: "What need is there to distinguish so carefully the civil from the natural?" What's all this "bonding", this solidarity to the civil which is chiefly occupied with what is corporeal and carnal??

To the unsuspecting Catholic youth of this East Africa section that has been Catholic since about 1900 and was given a native Bishop in 1936, JP2 sent out his call.  After patronizing the youth, he said: "Jesus Christ your elder brother calls the human family to unity...  Your baptism has bonded you to Christ to enter the community of the Church and to help your brothers and sisters..." JP2 had much to say.  He continued: "Open the Gospel together; seek what Christ and the Church are telling you to do for your peers, to react positively against the laissez- faire attitudes (free enterprise system) or individualism which thwart society. (!!!) "Your personality will not be mature unless you overcome the individualism which makes you avoid others.  Dialogue is the source of wisdom.  Sharing is the source of wealth.  It is in the communities of school, work, leisure, village or neighborhood that each person finds his true human dimension.  If you give your heart to your companions, you will be like brothers and sisters going into the forest together." (!!!)

Hearts of Jesus Mary Jospeh
Catholic Devotional Medal Depicting the Hearts of Mary, Jesus & Joseph

What happened to giving our hearts to Mary and through her Immaculate Heart to the Sacred Heart of Jesus? "Going into the forest" sounds like the scenario of "Little Red Riding Hood and the Big Bad Wolf," a Grimm's fairy tale, except this is for real.  Maybe it's an advance advertisement for Pepsi-Cola? As they have some real lu-lu's.  Or even Mello-Yello? But, to palm off as the Gospel of Christ? HOW BASE.

The dishonorable intentions of this pernicious fiend are obvious.  As St. Augustine, we ask: "What would a wise man think of JP2's theology whereas the King of Kings is given no higher status than any other man or "Brother".  While strange doors, odd paths, and a pointless compass for living life are laid on all the children in place of: "the Door, the Way, the Truth, the Light", these fundamentals every man needs to take into account for his last end?

Naturalist Pagan
Promoter of Paganism- Karol Wojtyla
Wojtyla would become a notorious Antipope (JP2)

Like the pagans, JP2 reverses the object to be adored: he teaches the children to break their hearts for each other, not for God: to lay their hearts on the altars of humanity, not a CONTRITE HEART LAID AT THE ALTAR OF GOD.

As to Plato, his debate was engaged in finding an honest answer, not in introducing errors.  To assuage, to alleviate this longing to give sacrifice became a holy quest.  He had deduced that the proper answer to man's longing for happiness would be found in offering sacrifice to God.  Solely by reason, Plato came to know God did not need sacrifice.  It was man who was in need of giving this to God; man needed to give His Creator sacrifice for four fulfilling reasons.  The problem to the pagans such as Plato was: do all spirits desire sacrifice, the good angels and bad? Or were these also pleased to see man offer sacrifice to God only?

LATRIA versus DULIA: Today we would call this debate, a matter of LATRIA over DULIA.

Divine adoration or latria is worship given to God alone.  It is the highest type of religious reverence.  This reverence we pay to the saints and angels is called DULIA.  And the chief act of latria or THE ACT OF SACRIFICE is never performed to express dulia, but only to express latria: SACRIFICE IS OFFERED TO GOD ALONE.  (Note: To Mary, the Mother of God, is offered a reverence which is higher than dulia and is called HYPERDULIA.  It is superior to dulia, it is never latria.)


Freemasonic Tribalism
Vatican II Pagans


Worshiping false gods never uplifted people, but on the contrary has led to degenerated morals.  Any claims of paganism to the name of "religious influence in either public or private life" adds up to a minus zero.  Paganism does not go upward, only downward.  No progress there.

Perhaps it drew devotees due to the mythical stories of perversions and scandals among the various gods or of the sadistic "mysteries of nature" which kept the "country folk" coming back.  The variety was endless: nature worship, polytheism, astral, solar, totemism, animism were all bit attractions.  JP2 is an admirer of animism, or animal worship as camera shots noted some years ago.  Animists believe in witchcraft and see trees, stones, and other natural objects as having souls.  These pagans become involved in the fetish of ancestor-worship, whose dead were now considered spirits able to enter any piece of matter or body they might wish!!! This in turn led to animal worship, including Charlie's 1986 affair with the African snakes. Animists were big wheels at the October 1986 Assisi Sacrilege.

Such pagan horrors JP2 accepts as diverse "cultures" that Catholicism is coaxed to accept as "ethnic" must be palmed off as "we are to love our neighbor" and therefore, in justice, we must accept this Pagan culture as or a par with the Revealed Religion!!! WHAT LIES!!!

In our research into animism, we were surprised to read that atheistic type of historians who believed in evolution considered it natural for those who lived near nature to attribute souls to inanimate things of nature.  These went so far as to trace religion itself to this nonsense.  For 300 years, this silly theory lived via an Ed Taylor and an Andrew Lang and on to the days of our old enemy Herbert Spencer, whose thoughts dominated the late Robert Weld of JBS fame.  It is also accepted in the study of PHENOMENOLOGY, so beloved by JP2, the man who quotes V-2 as his touch-stone!!! What goes around comes around.

St. Alphonus Liguori, Doctor of the Church
"The devil has always attempted, by means of the heretics, to deprive the world of the Mass, making them precursors of the Anti-Christ, who, before anything else, will try to abolish and will actually abolish the Holy Sacrament of the altar, as a punishment for the sins of men, according to the prediction of Daniel: ‘And strength was given him against the continual sacrifice' (Dan. 8:12)." -St. Alphonsus Liguori

PAGANISM LEADS TO FALSE IDEAS: We have noted that the ancient pagan indians, even though they sought to offer sacrifice to a god, actually reversed the object to be adored.  Now we see this same error has popped us in Paul 6's New Order of saying "the Mass".  Paul 6 and before him, John 23 said the changed Mass would help the people understand the Mass better.  But in fact, the two men have caused "the continual sacrifice" to be taken away as complained of by Christ in Matt. 24, where He Himself tells us to read of the "desolation" to come foretold by Daniel, who covers the "taking away of the CONTINUAL SACRIFICE" in great detail.  Since Christ spoke of this it has to be TRUE.

PAGANISM LEADS TO WORSHIP OF NATURE: After noting that the pagan mistake of "reversing the object to be adored" has been re-introduced by the Robber Council of 1962- 65 and its leaders in our own age under the guise of religion, we begin to note other pagan practices returning.

Have you been to any V-2 funerals? The dead die and are forgotten as flowers; from nature back to nature.  No hope held out for either Eternal Life; or the opposite in the death of deaths - ETERNAL DAMNATION.

There may be balloons and a jolly ring of rising to something or another, a hint of "cosmo".  The "healing" of the bereaved is paramount.  Like paganism, there is no moral or spiritual flavor.  Poetry and austerity, a fatalism has crept in and finally skepticism.  Sometimes a gorgeous looking ritual returns - PANTHEISM.  The individual soul has been swallowed up in a new naturalistic community.

Novus Ordo Abomination
In the Real Church, the Only Thing That Changes IS the Bread & Wine.
In the False church, the only thing that doesn't change is the Bread & Wine.

Paganism introduced other mistakes which is seen acted out by V-2 and its False Mass today.  As pagans began to make sacrifices of a horse to their idol they changed the role of the horse to an "effective" sacrifice as effective as the idol itself until even rice and barley became spiritually effective.

PAGANISM LEADS FINALLY TO MAN WORSHIPING MAN: To Hinduism with its numberless sects, goes the blame for the unwholesome worshiping of the reproductive organ of man himself.  Strangely, it is the seed vessel held as the interest, not where the human seed is naturally destined!!!

While it would not be a bad idea to consider the importance of the seed of life, in paganism, godless cults, secret societies, meant to worship Lucifer, interest in the seed of life takes over as an evil practice, a fetishism carried on in extreme and superstitious ways as seen in the Cabala and forms of Freemasonry.  The Hindus had their idol, Shiva or Siva which means the phallus and was a triad of gods from Hindu mythology, a symbolic of both death and reproduction.  Phallicism representations show a grotesque idol with four hands, and three eyes, garlanded with skulls, and armed with weapons of destruction.  Sometimes he is shown dancing on a prostrate body, and often too, in contemplation.  We mention this neurotic worship of the reproductive organ especially because of JP2 's fetishism with immoral lustful human sexuality preachments to so many youth groups.

Even as JP2 asks of all today and Paul 666 advised before him: "We must read the V-2 DOCUMENTS" and sure enough, as Cardinal Ottaviani complained the V-2 DOCUMENTS NO LONGER HELD TO THE DIVINE COMMAND OF THE PRIMARY END OF MARRIAGE AS THE BEGETTING OF CHILDREN, but to use sex for fun fun fun human sexuality!!! All of a sudden Lucifer has invested some rules regarding sex into the V-2 Rules Book.  We used to think that Catholics on the whole were unaware of this turn of events.  Now we think they know and think to quietly go along.  Quietly???

CAUSE OF THE SEX REVOLT: Changing the purpose for MATRIMONY caused the sexual Revolution.  By over-throwing the established doctrine commanded by the Divine Authority, Paul 6 via his beast-like Council turned away from God, revealing himself as a seed of Lucifer, warned of God the Father in Genesis (3:15).

To Cardinal Ottaviani goes the credit when, in exasperated unbelief, he drew everyone's attention to the new V-2 proposed definition of marriage which left out reproduction as the primary reason for Marriage as also the expectations of its end- CHILDREN!!! In other words:"increase and multiply" in Gen. 1:28 was under attack.  Paul 6 was attacking every truly Catholic family who had ever obeyed God and had large families; including Alfredo's who was himself the 11th of 12 children.  All people who had placed their trust in Divine Providence.

Catholic Matrimony
A Great Blessing from God: A Large Catholic Family

At one point, Cardinal Ottaviani signed what he thought was the final document, patterned after St. Augustine's summation of Marriage; only to be foiled by Paul 6's crafty maneuvering, naming the signed paper a mere trial balloon, "a draft" but the real document was not out yet.

When the document finally came, it read the same evil way Cardinal Ottaviani had criticized in the first place.

Protestants such as Dr. Robert McAfee Brown were thrilled.  Brown who had contributed an essay on this document did not hide the fact that V 2 had now changed the Catholic Church's Teachings "that the procreation of and education of children are the primary ends of marriage."

Brown called the change "an advance"- thanking Suenens and Leger (Canada) "and such men" for seeing to it that "conjugal love" now took top priority. Explained Brown, in his response in Abbott's book on the documents: "As to artificial birth control, this section is deliberately ambiguous.  In spite of a few reiterations of "traditional" teachings which will give pessimists an inclination to read it exclusively in such terms, the discussion is not closed.  The Council deliberately left the matter open and thus achieved a modest victory."

Continued Brown: "The crucial "footnote 14 (173) of the chapter on "Marriage" not only cites the traditional teaching of Pope Pius XI in his "Casti Connubii", but also cites Paul 6's speech to the Papal Commission on birth control, noting that a fresh examination of the problem is called for." Brown added that he could not underscore too strongly that the matter needs resolution, since others besides Roman Catholics are affected, for whom the denial of birth control information constitutes a moral as well as a social problem. !!! So said the Protestant Commentator at the 1962-65 illegal Council.  (Canon Law 2332)

Catholic Matrimony
Antipope Paul 6 giving his curse to the willing recipient *Joseph Ratzinger: *today's V-2 criminal papal usuper


THAT HE HAD ALREADY MODIFIED THEM BY CHANGING THE PURPOSE OF MARRIAGE FROM PROCREATION and EDUCATION OF CHILDREN, TO HUMAN sexuality as priority - he left unsaid.  People were already being told in the confessionals as early as 1963 that "the Pope was going to let up on birth control means." We know this from particular admissions of priests at that time who felt that a change was coming.



Once man began his attack upon God's Laws and began to think of population growth via his own world population standard as opposed to God the Father's command and method of counting we were all in big trouble.  God said: "increase and multiply" be as numerous as the grains of sand.  If He had wanted children by some other means He would have so supplied.

Paul 6 challenged God.  Now what?

The Council of Trent
The Council of Trent

SACRIFICE OLD AS THE WORLD: Even the Sacred Council of Trent states: "it is natural to man to desire to give visible sacrifice".  As many note, the nature of man is the same as today as when formed by our Omnipotent Creator.  Whether the four (now five -TCW) Conciliar pseudo-"popes" believe it or not, the desire to offer sacrifice to God is natural, for in doing this act, man finds the happiness he seeks - "beatitude" as expressed by St. Thomas.

For all the chatter in regards "unity" put forth by the exponents of V-2ism, only "beatitude" will ever achieve true unity.  Man had found this at last in the Divine Sacrifice of Christ.  Unhappily, John 23 and Paul 6 did not agree. Catering to Christ's enemies, the two men went along with the idea of taking the Sacrifice away from us.

"To adhere to a false Bishop of Rome [a false "pope"] is to be out of communion with the Church." -St. Cyprian

St. Thomas seems to have believed that even Adam, father of all of us, himself offered sacrifice to God!!! The reason there does not seem to be a written recording of this is easily answered.  "As the origin of sin is typified in Adam, the origin of sanctification ought not be indicated as typified by him." (Summa 2- 2-85, 1).

OBLIGATED TO OFFER SACRIFICE: The Natural Law, then obliges man to offer sacrifice to Almighty God.  Reason requires of man some sign of submission to God, and also some sign paying Him HONOR.  All over the universe, man has obeyed this inner demand to worship God by offering up a Sacrifice. (Latria)

As an official act of religion and external Divine Worship, there must be: (1.) a Victim: offered up to God as a bodily thing; the Victim must be offered up: (2.) by a qualified person, a duly ordained priest; (3.) at a suitable place, an altar; (4.) and the destruction or change of the Victim, called IMMOLATION must take place so as to express the supreme and unique dominion of God over all His creatures, and the absolute dependence of all creatures upon God.

OUR MORNING OFFERING: To Offer the Divine Sacrifice of Christ to the Father, in union with the Holy Ghost (the Divine Spirit) is a Special Act of Worship to God and therefore belongs to the VIRTUE OF RELIGION.

The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass
The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass

MAN FRUSTRATED WITHOUT THE TRUE SACRIFICE: Today we witness man deprived of offering the Sacrifice given to us by Christ Himself, Who came down from Heaven to be our Offering.

We have noted how the Protestants are the most conspicuous in frustrating this rule written in our hearts (Romans 2:14, 15).  Actually, 500 years ago they were Catholic and they had a trick played against them too, not unlike what has happened to us today.  But they did not know it was a mean trick until some number of years later when they awakened to the fact that they were no longer Catholics.  They no longer worshiped God by means of the Sacrifice He asked us to keep renewing so as to receive the graces and benefits of Calvary.  They woke up to discover they were now Protestants, protesting against Christ's Mass, along with His enemies.

So, for 500 years, although they go to a building on Sundays and they sing hymns and listen to a sermon, they PERSONIFY "THE FRUSTRATED MAN" as *Msgr. Sheen (*who sadly succumbed himself to the deadly V-2 epidemic. -The Editor of TCW) called the thwarted - they have a civil war going on inside, between their minds and souls.

CIVIL WAR INSIDE THE MINDS AND SOULS OF CATHOLICS: Due to John 23's and Paul 6's wish to give Catholics a non-sacrificial type Mass, Catholics of the 1980's and 1990's are like the Protestants and they will so remain until and unless they overthrow the cabal of robbers, the anti-Christs who have taken over in the Vatican today along with the apostate hierarchy.  Catholics will experience the pain caused by frustrating their very own nature.  We cannot continue to thwart one of Nature's basic laws, a Law our Creator place there, "written in our hearts".  This world-wide choking off of the Catholic's foremost and most common and closest contact with our Creator, Redeemer-Saviour, and Sanctifier in the RE-ENACTMENT OF CALVARY in the One and Only Acceptable Offering to the Holy Trinity.  Our hearts, our wills responded to Christ's Sacrifice because God is Good and in Him we found Felicity.  He was our BEATITUDE.  OUR TRUE HAPPINESS.

IS SACRIFICE NECESSARY?: Yes.  So then what has Paul 6 done to us? What evil has he wrought?

What Luther and Crammer were to the Revolt against Christ and His Divine Sacrifice some 500 years ago; John 23 and Paul 6 have accomplished for the enemy in our day.  The enemy learned a few new tricks, that's all.  They hit upon an illegal Council to pull off their world wide revolt for this final show of defiance against the King of Kings.  This time the very "Covenant of the Sanctuary" must be attacked in the Sistine Chapel at St. Peter's in Rome. The enemy was attempting to enter "the very veins" of the Church as Pope Pius X had warned back in 1903.  The 100 year final war that had begun in the time of Pope Pius IX was closing the gap.

His Holiness Pope Pius IX
"We place all Our hope in the God of Our salvation, who is Our helper and strength in all Our tribulations. He does not permit those who trust in Him to be confounded, He who thwarts the attacks of the impious and breaks the necks of sinners." -Pope Pius IX

We have Christ's Promise that His Church shall not fail nor will He fail His Church.  Still there are souls to be saved, individuals to be awakened from slumber, so they will be alerted to the harm - we MUST NOT FALL into Adam's Sin of PRIDE.

Of course, Adam's Sin was not of the flesh.  In his state of innocence there was no rebellion of flesh against the spirit.  St. Thomas says: the first inordinateness in the human appetite could not have been desire for material or sensible goods.  Adam desired some spiritual good beyond the reach of man.  The ordinate desire of the first man was made inordinate by the unsuitableness of a too-excellent object and the desire was thus transformed into a prideful aspiring.  Adam wanted something that belonged to God alone. ADAM AND EVE DISOBEYED GOD.  "V-2" LURES US BACK TO ORIGINAL SIN.  Paul 6 tried to teach us the same willful desire that the serpent held out to Adam: "you will be like to God." Seeing how man is made to the image of God, man is tempted therefore to extend that image into himself.  From the first sin of man (a sin of pride), today we commit it all over again.  This willful desire to have to have the divinity which belongs to God alone - here we go, under the invitation of Lucifer's seed, ready to fall into the same sin, the sin of the first man - to be as GOD.  Like Adam who wanted "knowledge of good and evil," (Gen. 3:22) so that by his own natural power and without reference of deference to God, he could know what was good or evil for him to do, and could know beforehand what good or evil would happen to him. (We see this enacted by many today: the abortion-advocates who refuse to acknowledge God as the first Owner of our body and our actions.  Then there is the wayward youth who only obeys their own whims.)

"He who goes about to take the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass from the Church plots
no less a calamity than if he tried to snatch the sun from the universe."
-St. John Fischer

Thus, as the first man aspired to a kind of equality with God, whereas he sinned by PRIDE, EVEN AS THE FALLEN ANGELS had sinned by PRIDE, Paul 6 by his prideful Council and his prideful "Liturgy of the Word" lured man to return to the FIRST SIN, to the PLACE OF THE VOMIT.  THE CIRCLE COMING AROUND AGAIN.

HAS NOT MANKIND LEARNED ANYTHING HELPFUL FROM THE PUNISHMENT OF THE SIN OF ADAM? If a person, because of a fault, is deprived of what was bestowed on him as a favor, the deprivation is a PUNISHMENT for the fault.  Now, the perfect subjection of man's lower powers to reason was a great favor bestowed on man.  Out of His perfect subjection of body to spirit came soundness of health and perfection of bodily function, and the supervening gift of bodily immortality was assured.  But when man sinned, the great favor mentioned was withdrawn (indeed, man's sin rejected the favor), and it was withdrawn in punishment for the sin.  The withdrawal of the favor meant that he would die.  Therefore, death is manifestly in punishment for Adam's sin.  Says St. Paul (Rom. 5:12): "By one man sin entered the world, and by sin, death."

Christ in House in Nazareth
The Second Adam: Painting of Christ as Young Boy in the Holy House of Nazareth Contemplating His Future Supreme Sacrifice

OTHER PUNISHMENTS: Today, man thinks there is no punishment for anything.  In fact, when punishment comes, it seems to be meted out to the victim rather than the guilty.  The higher up in the social sphere the less likely is the guilty punished.  If he has created a scandal the others have him murdered so he won't have to stand trail and unmask the others.  But God does not work like that.  Holy Scripture recounts other punishments for Adam's sin: expulsion of our first parents from Paradise; fatiguing toil; pains of child birth; reluctance of the earth to yield fruits, etc.  And now we come to the outcome of God's punishments.  Recall how our parents used to tell us that they were doing such and such a punishment "for your own good?" Well, St. Thomas says the same in regards all these punishments that came upon mankind because of the Sin of Adam.  They have turned out to be "blessings" for fallen man.  WHY??? Because once fallen, man would have found Paradise and life as it was before Adam's sin so delightful that he would no longer have had thought or time for God!!! Fallen man cannot stand a diet of Paradise.  Were it not for the hardships and punishments we must bear in consequence of Adam's sin, we should all inevitably go to Hell!!! Herein appear the Infinite Love and Mercy of God: when He strikes us in punishment, while we are wayfarers, His blow turns into the caress of Blessing.

THE TEMPTATION OF ADAM: Man, cowered with free will, HAD TO EXERCISE THAT FREE WILL IN CHOOSING OR REJECTING GOD.  Had there been no trial, no temptation, man would have had a kind of mechanical progress from Paradise to Heaven, and the greatest of His Gifts, the gift that makes man most like to God in his being (that is free will) would have been a vain and unused gift.  Free human nature had to have a chance to choose freely and this was given in the temptation.  There was no need for Adam to succumb to the temptation.  He had a perfect human nature, and he had SUPERNATURAL GRACE and SUPERNATURAL GIFTS.  No creature could harm him or force his choice, against his will.  That Adam sinned, that he chose to abuse freedom instead of using it, was his own fault.

The manner and order of the first man's temptation were entirely suitable.  The temptation was rounded and complete.  It appealed to the intellect and will: the appeal was made through the senses: into the whole event of the temptation there entered one of the man's own species, the woman; one thing of the animal order, the serpent; and one thing of the vegetable order, the tree with it's fruit.

Heaven or Hell
The Last Judgement

THE TEMPTATION OF THE LAST AGE: MAN'S LAST SIN: The last sin of Man is being enacted.  Now before our eyes.  Man intends to become DIVINE.  Like Adam, today's man desires what belongs to God alone.  Nevertheless, Man's Goal is to "GO FOR IT." [End]

Pray For True Papal Restoration!

Cardinal Manning citing the universal testimony of the Fathers of the early Church about The Apostasy "The apostasy of the city of Rome from the vicar of Christ and its destruction by Antichrist may be thoughts so new to many Catholics, that I think it well to recite the text of theologians of greatest repute. First Malvenda, who writes expressly on the subject, states as the opinion of Ribera, Gaspar Melus, Biegas, Suarrez, Bellarmine and Bosius that Rome shall apostatise from the faith, drive away the Vicar of Christ and return to its ancient paganism. ...Then the Church shall be scattered, driven into the wilderness, and shall be for a time, as it was in the beginning, invisible hidden in catacombs, in dens, in mountains, in lurking places; for a time it shall be swept, as it were from the face of the earth. Such is the universal testimony of the Fathers of the early Church." -Henry Edward Cardinal Manning, The Present Crisis of the Holy See, 1861, London: Burns and Lambert, pp. 88-90 (Click to view this tragic reality)

"He, Pope Gregory XVII, admitted in front of me that 'He was Pope Gregory XVII'. His (this) confirmation took place in Rome on June 14, 1988."
-Written statement by well known priest Fr. Khoat, who met with the Hidden Pontiff, His Holiness, Pope Gregory XVII ("Cardinal Siri").

Catholic Radio Podcast Online
TCW Radio

Listen to two special radio (podcast) interviews on True Papal Restoration by clicking here

The gentle St. Bernard did not honey his words when he attacked the enemies of the faith. Addressing Arnold of Brescia,
the great Liberal agitator of his times, he calls him in all his letters "seducer, vase of injuries, scorpion, cruel *wolf."

(Fr. Salvany, Liberalism is a Sin, Ch. 20, Polemical Charity And Liberalism)

Exposing Lying Frauds
"Appearances are deceptive." -Aesop

*Please see the Important Notice regarding treacherous Wolves in Sheep's Clothing by clicking here.

"Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist... The Church will be in eclipse..."
(Words spoken by Our Lady of La Salette to Melanie Calvat in 1846 A.D., a fully approved Church Apparition)

© In Today's Catholic World (TCW) 2005-2013 A.D. All rights reserved.

Fair Use Notice: This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human, religious, and social issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

Bookmark this site

Click To View TCW's Archives

Catholic News from StGemma.com Productions
© StGemma.com Web Productions Inc. 2005-2014. All rights reserved.